Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kuntal Hasmukhlal Shah Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kuntal Hasmukhlal Shah Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Section 14A Cannot Disallow Expenditure Never Claimed: ITAT Mumbai Deletes Entire Disallowance The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted a disallowance of ₹13.76 lakh made under section 14A read with Rule 8D for AY 2017–18, holding that expenditure not claimed as a deduction in the return of income cannot be disallowed. In this case, the assessee had earned exempt income by way of dividend income and long-term capital gains exempt under section 10(38) but had not made any suo motu disallowance under section 14A. During...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai Section 28 Land Acquisition Interest Exempt as Enhanced Compensation: ITAT Delhi Bogus Purchase Addition Cannot Be Based on Suspicion Alone: ITAT Chennai Section 69 Addition Deleted as No Evidence Linked Joint Holder to Alleged On-Money: ITAT Mumbai WhatsApp Chats Accepted as Evidence, On-Money Addition Limited to 25%: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031