Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shernickraj Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shernickraj Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) ITAT Chennai: Only Real Unexplained Portion of Cash Deposits Taxable; Section 115BBE @ 60% Not Applicable to Pre-1.4.2017 Transactions The Chennai Bench of the ITAT, in Shri Shernickraj v. ITO (AY 2017-18), dealt with addition on account of cash deposits during the demonetisation period and the applicable tax rate under section 115BBE. The assessee, engaged in a small facilitation business of collecting cash from the public and making online payments on their behalf (electricity bills, ticket bookings, transfers, etc.), had deposited ₹8.50 lakh in cash. The ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930