Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shernickraj Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shernickraj Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) ITAT Chennai: Only Real Unexplained Portion of Cash Deposits Taxable; Section 115BBE @ 60% Not Applicable to Pre-1.4.2017 Transactions The Chennai Bench of the ITAT, in Shri Shernickraj v. ITO (AY 2017-18), dealt with addition on account of cash deposits during the demonetisation period and the applicable tax rate under section 115BBE. The assessee, engaged in a small facilitation business of collecting cash from the public and making online payments on their behalf (electricity bills, ticket bookings, transfers, etc.), had deposited ₹8.50 lakh in cash. The ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Complianc U/s 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031