Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Razia Begum Mohammad Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Razia Begum Mohammad Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Disclosed Rental Receipts Can’t Be Taxed u/s 69A: Hyderabad ITAT Deletes Balance Addition The Hyderabad ‘SMC’ Bench of the ITAT, in Razia Begum Mohammad vs ITO (ITA No. 1645/Hyd/2025, AY 2017-18), deleted the residual addition of ₹91,090 u/s 69A, holding that the same represented rental income already disclosed in the return of income. During scrutiny assessment, the AO noticed cash deposits/credits aggregating to ₹5.91 lakh in the Assessee’s bank account during the demonetisation period (09.11.2016 to 31.12.2016) and treated the entire ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031