Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bhavana Vikram Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bhavana Vikram Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) On-Money Allegation Based Only on Third-Party Pen Drive & Statement Can’t Survive: ITAT Deletes Section 69 Additions Additions u/s 69 were made alleging cash on-money payments for purchase of a shop in “Platinum Mall”, based solely on statements of Rubberwala Group employee Shri Imran Ansari & Excel data found in a pen drive seized from his possession during search on Rubberwala Group. Tribunal noted that the shop transaction itself took place only in FY 2018-19 relevant to AY 2019-20, hence additions in AYs 2017-18 & 2018-19 were fac...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930