Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bhavana Vikram Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bhavana Vikram Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) On-Money Allegation Based Only on Third-Party Pen Drive & Statement Can’t Survive: ITAT Deletes Section 69 Additions Additions u/s 69 were made alleging cash on-money payments for purchase of a shop in “Platinum Mall”, based solely on statements of Rubberwala Group employee Shri Imran Ansari & Excel data found in a pen drive seized from his possession during search on Rubberwala Group. Tribunal noted that the shop transaction itself took place only in FY 2018-19 relevant to AY 2019-20, hence additions in AYs 2017-18 & 2018-19 were fac...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031