Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Harjivanbhai Makanbhai Barasara Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Harjivanbhai Makanbhai Barasara Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) Assessee filed quantum & penalty appeals with heavy delay: 2 years 3 months in quantum appeal & over 1 year in penalty appeal. CIT(A)/NFAC dismissed both solely on limitation without examining merits. Assessee explained through affidavit that he is an uneducated individual who fully relied on his CA/advocate; despite receiving documents from Assessee, the CA negligently failed to file appeals in time. Assessee argued that he should not suffer for the professional’s mistake. Tribunal held that the explanation was bona fide & sup...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Vague Purpose in Form 10? ITAT Gives Trust a Second Chance Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Late Form 67 – Bang ITAT Allows Substantive Relief CIT(A) Cannot Enhance on New Issue; JDA Additions & U/s 2(22)(e) Deletions Upheld No Exempt Income = No U/s 14A Disallowance – ITAT Bangalore Reaffirms Settled Law View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930