Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Loocust Incorp (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Loocust Incorp (ITAT Chennai) Bogus Purchase Reopening, 148 Validity, 153C vs 147 — ITAT Says CIT(A) Failed to Apply Mind – CIT(A) Ignored Key Legal Issues; Non-Speaking CIT(A) Order Set Aside Revenue appealed against the relief granted by CIT(A) on reassessment issues involving alleged bogus purchases from C. Kumar Enterprises based on the search statement of entry-operator Maniklal Daga The Assessee filed Cross-Objections challenging reopening u/s 148, borrowed satisfaction, non-issue of notice u/s 143(2), non-invocation of s.153C, invalidation of return, and merits of additi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031