This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Only First 142(1) Default Penalizable: ITAT Slashes Penalty and Sends Other Issues Back
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Gajanfar Ali Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chandigarh
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Gajanfar Ali Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Penalty Package Broken: Six Defaults Under 142(1): ITAT Says Only First One Valid—₹50,000 Penalty Deleted- Major Penalties Sent Back- Trims 271(1)(b) & Cut Down to ₹10,000 Only
Assessee filed three appeals challenging penalties: ₹60,000 u/s 271(1)(b) for six non-compliances, ₹25,000 u/s 271A for failure to maintain books & ₹5,01,260 u/s 271(1)(c) for alleged concealment. CIT(A) dismissed all appeals in limine citing delay of 139 days without condonation.
Before Tribunal, AR pleaded for adjudication on merits, pointing out that the quant...





