Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sonu Goma Bhangale Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-2011
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sonu Goma Bhangale Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Assessee, an individual, did not file return for AY 2010-11. Based on cash deposits of Rs.42,64,155/- in Godavari Laxmi Co-op Bank, notice u/s 148 was issued. Assessee filed return declaring Rs.1,25,840/- as income & agricultural income of Rs.65,00,000/-. AO completed reassessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s.147 accepting the returned figures. Subsequently, PCIT revised this order u/s 263 on 30.03.2020 directing AO to verify the source of cash deposits & agricultural income claim. AO thereafter framed order u/s 147 r.w.s.263 making addition of Rs.47,57,055/- ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930