Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sonu Goma Bhangale Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-2011
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sonu Goma Bhangale Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Assessee, an individual, did not file return for AY 2010-11. Based on cash deposits of Rs.42,64,155/- in Godavari Laxmi Co-op Bank, notice u/s 148 was issued. Assessee filed return declaring Rs.1,25,840/- as income & agricultural income of Rs.65,00,000/-. AO completed reassessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s.147 accepting the returned figures. Subsequently, PCIT revised this order u/s 263 on 30.03.2020 directing AO to verify the source of cash deposits & agricultural income claim. AO thereafter framed order u/s 147 r.w.s.263 making addition of Rs.47,57,055/- ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031