Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Indubala Jayant Jain Vs ITO
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Indubala Jayant Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Reassessment Quashed as Notice Issued by Non-Jurisdictional AO: ITAT Mumbai Nullifies Entire 148 Proceedings In this appeal, Smt. Indubala Jayant Jain challenged the reassessment framed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 pursuant to a notice issued u/s 148 dated 30.03.2017 by ITO Ward 17(2)(1), Mumbai, though her assessed jurisdiction was with ITO Ward 15(2)(4), Mumbai. Assessee had filed her original return on 28.07.2010 declaring income of ₹14,15,680 & the same was processed u/s 143(1). The case was reopened on the basis of AST information treating her as a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031