Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kirit Kumar Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kirit Kumar Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Both Additions u/s 69A Deleted: Cash Deposit from Pre-Demonetisation Balance & Flat Purchase Through Book-Entry Proven Hyderabad Tribunal examined two additions made u/s 69A+Rs.14,00,000 deposited during demonetisation & Rs.79,60,000 towards flat purchase. Assessee demonstrated that his proprietorship accounts for AY 2016–17 were duly audited before demonetisation, reflecting a genuine cash-in-hand of Rs.20,94,588 as on 31.03.2016, much prior to 08.11.2016. Personal day-to-day cash statement showed continued drawdown leading to Rs.14,53,456 a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031