This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Revenue’s Capital Gain Estimation Deleted for Ignoring Co-Owners’ Accepted Costs
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Jay Kishan Soni Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2013-14
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Jay Kishan Soni Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
ITAT Ahmedabad Allows Capital-Loss Claim: Long-Term Maintenance Expenditure Accepted Despite Missing Bills
In this appeal, Assessee, a joint owner of an old building rented to a Government School, challenged the action of AO & CIT(A) in treating ₹6,00,000 as long-term capital gain by restricting indexed cost of acquisition to ₹1,10,000 & rejecting Assessee’s claim of having incurred development & maintenance expenditure over nearly 20 years. Assessee had declared a long-term capital loss of ₹2,13,882 based on indexed ...






