Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jay Kishan Soni Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jay Kishan Soni Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITAT Ahmedabad Allows Capital-Loss Claim: Long-Term Maintenance Expenditure Accepted Despite Missing Bills In this appeal, Assessee, a joint owner of an old building rented to a Government School, challenged the action of AO & CIT(A) in treating ₹6,00,000 as long-term capital gain by restricting indexed cost of acquisition to ₹1,10,000 & rejecting Assessee’s claim of having incurred development & maintenance expenditure over nearly 20 years. Assessee had declared a long-term capital loss of ₹2,13,882 based on indexed expenditure of ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031