The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT’s decision annulling the assessment after finding that statutory approval under Section 153D was granted without proper application of mind.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT s ruling that assessment orders were invalid because the approving authority granted Section 153D approval mechanically without examining the records.
The Bombay High Court invalidated reassessment proceedings because the satisfaction note was recorded with delay and lacked a mandatory Document Identification Number.
The High Court held that provisional attachment of fixed deposits cannot be ordered without recording proper reasons and satisfaction based on tangible material. Since the orders were cryptic and lacked justification, they were set aside.
The High Court set aside GST registration cancellations because the show cause notices did not propose retrospective cancellation. Authorities must clearly notify taxpayers before taking such action.
The Karnataka High Court held that non-submission of LUT/Bond prior to export is a curable procedural lapse. Refund claims cannot be rejected solely on that ground and must be reconsidered.
This article explains how technology, ESG considerations, and digital business models are transforming insolvency practice under the IBC. It highlights the need for modern valuation, governance accountability, and tech-driven insolvency processes.
GST law allows appeals within three months with a maximum condonation of one additional month. Courts have largely held that delays beyond 120 days cannot be condoned except in rare circumstances.
The High Court held that prolonged failure to file GSTR-3B returns and pay GST can justify action under Section 74. Delayed payments from clients do not excuse statutory GST compliance.
The Income-tax Act, 2025 reorganises the capital gains taxation framework while retaining the core principles of the earlier law. It clarifies definitions, holding periods, and tax treatment of gains from transfer of capital assets.
