Bombay High Court ruled that transferring a taxpayer’s case is unnecessary when assessment for relevant year has already been finalized, quashing earlier impugned order.
Gujarat High Court held that non-granting of personal hearing in spite of being requested is clear violation and breach of principles of natural justice. Accordingly, order quashed and remanded to AO for fresh de novo order.
ITAT Jaipur held that Rs. 8.9 lakh surrendered during a survey and included in books as business income cannot be taxed under section 69C or 115BBE of Income Tax Act.
The High Court held that a later Supreme Court judgment cannot justify invoking Section 254(2) to modify an ITAT order passed according to the prevailing law.
NCLAT Delhi held that initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process by admitting application u/s. 7 justifiable since application duly filed within 3 years of ‘Promise to Pay’ under section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Accordingly, appeal dismissed.
ITAT Delhi held that trade scheme payment to sales promoters whether pure reimbursement or not needs proper verification and since AO granted relief without proper verification and application of mind, PCIT rightly invoked revisionary proceedings u/s. 263.
The Bombay High Court held that when sales are accepted, entire bogus purchases cannot be added; only profit difference is taxable in the case of traders.
ITAT Kolkata held that investments in foreign life insurance policies were made from legitimate non-resident income and inherited sources. Addition of Rs. 1.08 crore under Black Money Act was deleted.
Gujarat High Court held that order passed in GST MOV-11 is appealable before appellate authority as per provision of section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act [GST Act]. Accordingly, petitioner not entertained in view of the alternative efficacious remedy available to the petitioner.
ITAT Mumbai held that USD 2.41 lakh deposits in Jersey bank accounts were inherited from the assessee’s parents and not undisclosed foreign income, setting aside the CIT(A)’s addition under the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) Act.
