In Puneet Batra vs UOI, the Delhi HC ruled that GST officials cannot access a lawyer’s computer without his presence, and set conditions for examining seized data.
The Delhi High Court has set aside a 3.16 crore GST demand against National Aluminium Company Limited (NALCO), ruling that the company was not given a proper opportunity to respond.
he Delhi High Court directs the Customs Department to refund a Kuwaiti resident for a seized gold piece that was disposed of prematurely.
The Karnataka High Court dismisses a Revenue appeal, affirming that a ₹7 crore share sale was a genuine transaction and not unexplained income under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.
The ITAT Kolkata quashed a penalty on a taxpayer, ruling that a one-time settlement from an employer was a capital receipt. The court held that no concealment of income occurred as the amount was disclosed in the tax return.
The ITAT Kolkata dismisses the Revenue’s appeal, ruling that a ₹1.59 crore addition for alleged bogus sales was unfounded, as the company provided substantial evidence including e-way bills and bank statements.
The Delhi High Court has set aside a Rs. 2 lakh penalty on a 19-year-old taekwondo player, Vivek Kumar Singh, finding that he was acting on instructions from his coach.
The Madras High Court ruled that a taxpayer’s timely manual appeal is valid, directing an appellate authority to decide on a case related to an e-invoice issue.
The ITAT dismisses a tax addition on Hitesh Trading Company, finding the Assessing Officer’s estimation of a higher gross profit was arbitrary and lacked legal justification.
ITAT deleted an addition of ₹3.80 lakh made towards leave encashment under Section 43B, ruling that the Commissioner of Principal Commissioner (CPC) had no jurisdiction to make the addition.
