The ITAT in Rajkot reduced a penalty against a taxpayer from ₹30,000 to ₹10,000, ruling that a single penalty should be levied for multiple non-compliances that occurred during the same proceedings.
The Calcutta High Court has ordered tax authorities to refund an excess amount recovered from Supreme Infotrade, citing a premature recovery during the appeal period.
The Calcutta High Court has quashed the bank account attachment of Shashi Kant Jaiswal, permitting them to file a GST appeal after an alleged procedural error.
Orissa High Court has quashed an ex parte service tax demand, ruling that tax authority’s failure to consider petitioner’s arguments constituted a denial of a fair hearing.
The Calcutta High Court fined Merc Infra India Private Limited ₹1 lakh, stating the company misused the court’s jurisdiction to delay a tax deposit.
The Calcutta High Court ordered the revival of a GST registration that was canceled for non-filing of returns, stating that cancellation is counter-productive to revenue.
CESTAT Kolkata ruled on the timely filing of an appeal, stating that without proof of service, the date an attested copy was provided can be considered the date of service.
The Andhra Pradesh High Court, in the case of N.Srinivasa Rao vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, directed authorities to consider a petitioner for promotion despite a pending departmental inquiry, citing administrative timelines for such proceedings.
Uttarakhand High Court held that inquiries into GST registration, dues, and TDS deductions cannot be addressed through a writ petition and advised proper authority approach.
The Calcutta High Court reinstated Sourav Ganguly’s GST appeal, calling the demand for a further pre-deposit a travesty of justice since an excess amount had already been recovered.
