Explore the Customs Authority ruling on ULDs by Pridel Private Limited in Mumbai. Learn about the exemption from Customs duty, clearance procedures, and the complexities involved in ULDs’ temporary import and re-export.
Central Registration Centre (CRC), an initiative by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) aimed at providing fast and efficient incorporation services. Learn about the services offered, name availability application process, resubmission guidelines, and more.
A comprehensive analysis of the provisions under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 relating to the restoration of attached properties. Explore how the Act balances the powers of the Enforcement Directorate and the rights of third parties.
Section 13(8)(b) and Section 8(2) of IGST Act are legal, valid, and constitutional & these provisions should operate exclusively within scope of IGST Act, and cannot be applied to levy tax on services under CGST
ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of appellant, holding that they had indeed complied with statutory notice and therefore levy of penalty under section 272A(1)(d) of the Act was not justifiable
ITAT Delhi’s verdict in the case of Gawar Constructions Co. Vs DCIT, illuminating the importance of clear particulars in the imposition of tax penalties. Understand how discrepancies between the initial ‘satisfaction’ and the grounds for penalty can lead to quashing of penalty orders.
ITAT Delhi’s decision in case of Sumita Devi Vs ITO, showcasing how chronic health conditions can impact filing of appeals and lead to ex parte orders.
ITAT Surat’s in case of Nileshkumar Chhaganbhai Vasoya Vs ITO, held that legal illiteracy of a common man is not an excuse for delay in filing appeal
CESTAT held that services such as Courier Agency, Exhibition, Insurance, Internet fall under Input Service, thus qualifies for Cenvat credit
In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court set aside the order and notice issued under Section 148A(d) and 148, respectively, in the case of Premium Estates Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT. The court directed the Assessing Officer to conduct a de novo assessment after the petitioner received the notice on the same day as the order.
