Stay informed with the latest regulatory updates for January 2023. Explore changes in company law, securities law, and insolvency law. Get insights on amendments, filing requirements, and case laws.
NCLAT Chennai refused to condone the delay in filing of an appeal as in the presentation of the Appeal there was delay of 2 days, after 45 days, and the same is beyond a period of limitation.
ITAT Rajkot held that the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the Act cannot be denied only on the basis that the assessee did not file its return of income within due date u/s 139(1) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition merely on the basis of seized paper which is neither signed nor dated, without any corroborative evidence, is untenable in law.
ITAT Delhi held that the centralised services fee received by the assessee cannot be treated as FTS under Article 12 of the India-Singapore tax treaty, hence not taxable in India.
Auditor has reported that company has not complied with Accounting Standard 15 specified under section 133 of Act read with Rule 7 of Companies(Accounts) Rules, 2014, where no actuarial valuation is done for gratuity and leave encashment for the financial years 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20. Hence the company has not complied with section 134(3)(f) of the Companies Act, 2013. Therefore, the company and every officer who is in default are liable for penal action under Section 134(8) of the Companies Act, 2013.
In re D D International Pvt. Ltd (GST AAR Haryana) 1. Whether GST would be leviable on export of pre-packaged and labelled rice upto 25 Kgs, to foreign buyer? Yes 1. Whether GST would be applicable on supply of pre-packaged and labelled rice upto 25 Kgs, to exporter on ‘bill to ship to’ basis i.e., […]
AAR ruled that ‘Bouquets’ made with dry parts of plants, foliage, flower buds, grasses, and branches of plants which dried, bleached, dyed, and coloured and sold with plastic foil packaging will be classifiable under Tariff Item No. 06039000 or 06049900 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and would be exempted from GST
In re Anmol Industries Limited (GST AAR West Bengal) Finally, we proceed to appreciate the issue of admissibility of this application with reference to section 103 of the GST Act and for that purpose, we like to reproduce subsection (1) of section 103 of the GST Act which reads as follows: “Applicability of advance ruling.— […]
In re Somnath Flour Mills Private Limited (GST AAR West Bengal) What is the value of supply of services provided by the applicant for conversion of wheat provided by the State Government into atta/ fortified atta, for distribution by the State Government through Public Distribution System and what is the rate of tax applicable on […]
