"05 November 2017" Archive - Page 2

52 Important Services available on GST Portal

52 Important Services available on GST Portal Includes GST REG-01, Form GST REG-29, Form GST CMP-01,Form GST CMP-02, Intimation to pay tax under composition levy, Form GST CMP-03, Intimation of details of stock on date of opting for composition levy, Form GST CMP-04, Withdrawal from composition levy, Form GST ITC-01, Form GST ITC-03, Sto...

Read More

How to download Excel based GSTR 4 Offline utility

GSTR-4 offline utility has been put into Public Domain. Now It can be downloading from GST portal by following below link. https://www.gst.gov.in/downloads...

Read More

Capital gain from penny stocks not bogus for violation of SEBI regulations by broker

ITO Vs. Arvind Kumar Jain HUF (ITAT Mumbai)

Where assessee’s broker share transaction was bone fide in all respect, merely because share broker was tainted violating SEBI regulations, would not make assessee’s share transactions bogus....

Read More

Bogus Purchase- Addition by GP rate of 8% on bogus purchases justified

Pr. CIT Vs Jagdish H Patel (Gujarat High Court)

Assessee’s contention that adding the entire amount of bogus purchases would give a completely distorted figure and the gross profit would be higher than the total turnover. Such bogus purchases were for off-setting the purchases from producers and agriculturists directly who would not have the billing facility. Only question seriously ...

Read More

S. 254 Miscellaneous petitions filed after 6 months from ITAT order date is barred by limitation

Shamsunissa Begum Vs. Dy. CIT (ITAT Bangalore)

Question of rectification of mistake cannot be entertained until and unless the Miscellaneous Petition filed by the assessee is found to be maintainable. The miscellaneous petitions filed by the assessee are beyond the period of 6 months from 1-6-2016 and therefore the same are barred by limitation. ...

Read More

Assessee not in-default for non deduction of TDS if recipient was not liable to tax

CIT (TDS) Vs. Sahara India Commercial Corpn. Ltd. (Allahabad High Court)

It is an important aspect to be examined whether Recipient- Assessee has directly paid tax or has no liability of tax at all. Since this aspect was not examined by Assessing Authority, therefore, in our view, Tribunal has rightly remanded matter to Assessing Authority to examine this aspect....

Read More

Rule 8D Disallowance cannot be made by ‘Change of Opinion’

Samvardhana Motherson International Ltd Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr. (Delhi High Court)

Rule 8D is triggered only in a case where the AO is not satisfied with the deduction made by the Assessee. The reasons to believe assume and are predicated on the belief that the AO should not have accepted the Petitioner’s deduction as explained and justified, albeit should have applied Rule 8D. Thus, the view and opinion formed by the...

Read More

Search Posts by Date

September 2020