Join our webinar on July 24-25 for an in-depth analysis of Union Budget 2024. Learn about tax proposals, sector impacts, and investment insights. Register now!
Join CA Sachin Jain for a live course on Input Tax Credit from a litigation perspective. Gain practical insights and master ITC complexities. Register now!
In these writ petitions, the writ petitioners are asking for some extension of time for submission of income tax returns in respect of certain categories of assesses, including the companies, firms and individuals
ITAT Ahmedabad has held in the case ITO v Someshwar Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. that the TDS would be deducted u/s 194C only when the amount of single contract exceeds Rs. 20,000 or the amount exceeds Rs. 50,000 in aggregate which has been given to a particular person in a year.
In the case of Flevel International V/S Commissioner Of Central Excise, it was held by Delhi High Court that the denial of an opportunity of cross-examination of a witness whose statements have been relied upon in the adjudication order would vitiate the order of adjudication. In the present case
In the case of Commissioner of Customs vs. M/s. Seiko Brushware India , it was held by Supreme Court that benefit of exemption Notification No. 34/98-Cus. Dated 13.06.1998 for NIL SAD is not granted in respect of such goods which the importer sells post importation from a place located in an area where no tax is chargeable on sale of goods.
In the case of M/s. Rupa & Co. Limited Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise, it was held that what is contained in finished product is only a quantity of all the inputs of the same weight as that of the finished product
ITAT Chandigarh held In the case of DCIT vs. M/s Indo Soviet Friendship that the Assessing Officer has not brought any material on record as to how he has given his finding that the cars have been purchased for the benefit of the Chairman.
It has been brought to the notice of the Government that a fake order dated 26th September 2015 supposedly under section 119 of the Income-tax Act 1961 under the signature of one Upmanyu Reddy, Under Secretary to the Government of India is in circulation. The fake order extends the due date for filing of audit report under section 119 of the Income-tax Act to 15 October 2015.
Finance Minister Arun Jaitley Formalizes Merger of Forward Markets Commission (FMC) with SEBI; FM: Amalgamation of FMC And SEBI would bring Convergence of Regulations in the Commodities and Equity Derivatives Markets; FM: Markets Thrive where there is Confidence and Integrity and the Regulator must ensure that Manipulative Activities are Curbed in Derivatives Market
Finance Minister Arun Jaitley : New Law on Anvil for Fast Track Arbitration in Order to Address the Stressed Areas of the Banking Sector; Reiterates the Government’s Commitment to Give Operational Freedom to the Public Sector Banks (PSBs); Efforts are on to Give Shape to the Banking Bureaus and to Professionalize all Personnel Issues. The […]
10 Reasons, why you cannot rely on order dated 26.09.2015 which says that due date for Income Tax Return been extended to 15th October 2015.1. We confirmed with CBDT officials and they denied issue of any such Notifications. 2. We checked the official Websites of Income Tax, Government of India and Finance ministry and have not found any such notification, Order or announcement.
