Follow Us:

Archive: 29 July 2011

Posts in 29 July 2011

Notification No. 69/2011-Customs dated the 29th July, 2011

July 29, 2011 67199 Views 0 comment Print

Provided that the exemption shall be available only if importer proves to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner of Customs or Assistant Commissioner of Customs, as the case may be, that the goods in respect of which the benefit of this exemption is claimed are of the origin of Japan, in terms of rules as may be notified in this regard by Central Government by publication in the official gazette.

Draft Circular on Providing Gifts to shareholders during AGM of Company

July 29, 2011 7785 Views 2 comments Print

MCA draft circular proposes ban on gifts at AGMs, allowing only light refreshments and treating violations as misconduct under corporate governance norms.

Bonus shares eligible for benefit u/s 115F of the Act if if original shares acquired in foreign currency – ITAT Mumbai

July 29, 2011 1251 Views 0 comment Print

Sanjay Gala Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)- In the present case, the assessee subscribed to shares in convertible foreign exchange and acquired the foreign exchange asset. In so far as this aspect is concerned, there is no dispute from the revenue authorities.

Canvassing agent not business connection , Non-Resident, even with ‘business connection’, can be taxed only in respect of business operations carried out in India

July 29, 2011 2143 Views 0 comment Print

ADIT Vs Star Cruise India Travel Services (ITAT Mumbai)- In the case of a business of which all the operations are not carried out in India, the income of the business deemed under this clause to accrue or arise in India shall be only such part of the income as is reasonably attributable to the operations carried out in India” but then since no part of the operations was carried out in India, no part of assessee’s income could have been thus taxable in India.

It is impermissible in a review petition for an assessee to re-argue and re-agitate the issues/questions which have been already considered and decided by the High Court

July 29, 2011 963 Views 0 comment Print

Ravina Khurana Vs CIT (Delhi High Court)- The applicant wants to re-argue and re-agitate the issues/ questions which have been considered and decided by this Court in the decision dated 20th April, 2011. This is not permissible. The review application has no merit and it is accordingly dismissed.

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031