presentations have been received from the trade and also from the Economic and Commercial Counsellor’s Office Embassy of People’s Republic of China, New Delhi informing that, State Administration for entry – exit inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China has now been authorised by the concerned authority in China to issue such gradation certificates as were being issued earlier by CCIB, China.
Attention is invited to Paragraph 6.8 of the Handbook (Vol.1) wherein it has been stated that in such cases where nexus norms have already been communicated by Headquarters in any case or the same is already established on the basis of the EPCG licences issued in the past by the Port Offices, such applications may not be forwarded to Headquarters EPCG Committee.
Many references have been received seeking clarification whether a DEPB can be issued against a White Colour Shipping Bill generated through the EDI Systems in Customs. In this connection, it is clarified that DEPB benefits can be granted against a Shipping Bill, irrespective of its colour, having an endorsement on the Shipping Bill that the exports are made under the DEPB Scheme.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (4) of rule 52AA of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 the Central Board of Excise and Customs hereby specifies the following details which an invoice issued by a registered person under said sub-rule (4) shall contain
DGFT updates EXIM Code and import policy in Notification No. 9 (RE-2000) dated 07 April 2000, correcting entries from Notification No. 2 (RE-2000).
Representations have been received from the Exporters and the Trade that the Drawback on unmachined sanitary castings and unmachined industrial castings is not being allowed under S.S. No. 73.03 of the Drawback Table as the corresponding Customs Tariff Heading has not been mentioned against the said Drawback S.S. No. in the Drawback Tables for the year 1997-98, 1998-99
Circular No. 525/21/2000-CX The Supreme Court in its order dated 2.11.99 in the Civil Appeal No. 10744-45/95 in the case of M/s Hindustan Sanitaryware and Industries Ltd and another Vs Commissioner of Customs Calcutta has finally settled the issue regarding this distinction sought to made between a “Spare part” and the component part. As may be observed, the Apex Court has approved the decision of the larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Jindal Strips Ltd. Vs CC, Bombay (1997) (94) ELT 234
The application shall file one application relating to one export product group from one port of export. Where export product falling under one product group have been exported from different port of registration, the exporter shall file more than one application for the same export product group.
