Delhi ITAT rules that disallowance of Section 80M deduction and GST refund mismatches are debatable issues, falling outside limited jurisdiction of Section 143(1). Intimation against Coforge Ltd. quashed for being ultra vires and violating natural justice.
Delhi ITAT upholds the ₹50 Lakh bogus sale addition against a jeweller, finding no proof of bullion transport and confirming the buyer was an entry operator.
Delhi ITAT sustained a Rs.14.69 Cr unexplained loan addition under Section 68 against Alvin Reality, ruling that companies with less than Rs.2,000 in income and minimal reserves cannot be deemed creditworthy to advance multi-crore loans.
Following SC’s E-Funds ruling, Delhi ITAT confirmed Concentrix US has no PE in India. The Tribunal also held that IPLC/link charges are non-taxable reimbursements, not ‘royalty’ under Article 12 of the India-US DTAA.
The ITAT Delhi ruled that Section 68 (unexplained cash credits) cannot be invoked against journal entry adjustments where no cash or equivalent funds flowed into the assessee’s account. The ₹10.51 Cr addition was deleted.
Delhi ITAT confirms that an AO cannot disallow purchases of Rs.3.82 Cr as bogus (Adventure Resorts And Cruises Pvt. Ltd.) without rejecting the books of accounts under Section 145.
ITAT Delhi quashes the assessment for Carissa Investment Pvt. Ltd., holding that an AO who ignores a previously accepted correct address forfeits the presumption of valid service.
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that addition made by application of provisions of section 50C of the Income Tax Act justifiable since SRO rates rightly adopted in absence of any objection from assessee company.
Gujarat High Court held that provisions of Section 13 of the Income Tax Act can be invoked only at the time of assessment and not at the time of grant of registration under Section 12A of the Act. Accordingly, writ disposed as devoid of merits.
Bombay High Court held that denial of exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act for delay of mere 29 days in filing of Form No. 10B is not justifiable since denial of exemption is likely to cause genuine hardship to the Charitable Trust.
