Writ of prohibition restraining the respondents fromgiving effect to the notices issued for assessment dated 22nd May, 1987, notices for penalty dated 4th August, 1987 and notices for launching of prosecution dated 31st July, 1987 all under the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 (Wealth Tax Act); and
Ajith A.R. Vs State Tax Officer (Kerala High Court) Petitioner seeks release of the goods detained by the first respondent under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act as also the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act. 2. It is seen that an identical matter has been disposed of by a […]
The alternative submission that the amount of loan written off would be taxable under Section 28(iv) of the Act also came up for consideration before this Court in the matter of Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. ( supra) and it was held therein that Section 28(iv) of the Act would apply only when a benefit or perquisite is received in kind and has no application where benefit is received in cash or money.
We are pained to record this most unreasonable attitude on the part of the Advocate for the Revenue of seeking to reargue settled concluded issues, without having obtained any stay from the Apex Court. This results in unnecessary wastage of the scarce judicial time available in the context of the large number of the appeals awaiting consideration.
Bijoy Shribastab & Anr. Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) It is not in dispute that the assessee had not maintained books of accounts for his transport business. It is not in dispute that the assessee owns less than 10 vehicles and is accordingly entitled to offer income u/s 44AE of the Act. It is not the […]
Ms. Bank Note paper Mill India Pvt. Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT held that where the interest receipt is directly connected or incidental to working of construction of assessee plant, it should be reduced from the capital cost of project and not be treated as income. Statement provided by assesse in form of Annexure […]
(1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 23,04,369 by considering the same to be service tax? (2) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 53,600 made under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?
In re M/s. A.W. Faber-Castell (India) Pvt. Ltd (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question: What is the appropriate classification and rate of CGST on the supply of the product in question- Modelling Dough. Answer : Modelling dough will be covered under CTH 3407 under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE […]
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “CGST Act and MGST Act”] by NUTAN WAREHOUSING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following issues.
When purchase and sale of shares were supported by proper Contract Notes, shares were purchased and sold through recognised broker and sale considerations were received by Account Payee Cheques, the transactions could not be treated as bogus and loss on account of client code modifications should be allowed.
