Follow Us:

Judiciary

Time barred ARA order rectification application not maintainable

December 3, 2019 798 Views 0 comment Print

Further, the applicant has filed rectification application on 10.10.2019 which is beyond the statutory limit of six months as prescribed under Section 102 of CGST Act/MGST Act, 2017. It is delayed and barred by limitation. Therefore, the said application is not found tenable under scope of rectification. Hence it is rejected.

AAR allows ‘Life Health Foods’ to withdraw application

December 3, 2019 869 Views 0 comment Print

In re Life Health Foods India Pvt. Ltd (GST AAR Maharashtra) The Application in GST ARA Form No. 01 of M/s. Life Health Foods India Pvt Ltd., vide reference ARA No. 44 dated 18.09.2019, is disposed of, as being withdrawn voluntarily and unconditionally. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA PROCEEDINGS (under […]

AAR not allowed to answer question raised by Non-supplier

December 3, 2019 1002 Views 0 comment Print

The applicant have themselves submitted that the scrap is the property of the vendors. Hence question with respect to taxability of sale/supply of such scrap can be raised only by the concerned vendors and not by the applicant. Hence in view of the provisions of Section 95 of the GST Act, since the supply of scrap, will not be undertaken/is proposed to be undertaken, by  the applicant, we are of the opinion that this authority is not allowed to answer the question raised by the applicant, being out of the purview of sec. 95 of CGST Act.

Amount received through Will of God Mother Eligible for Exemption u/s 56(2)(vii)

December 3, 2019 1134 Views 0 comment Print

Cynthia Ramona Chellappa Vs. ITO (ITAT Chennai) The issue under consideration is whether the amount received through the Will of God-Mother is eligible for exemption u/s 56(2)(vii)? ITAT states that a perusal of the provisions of Section 56(2)(vii) shows that any amount received by an individual without consideration and the aggregate value exceeds 50,000, the […]

AAR cannot decide on Surrender of GST registration

December 3, 2019 8853 Views 0 comment Print

In other words, Section 97(2), which encompasses the questions, for the ruling by this Authority does not deal with the issue of whether a GST registration should be surrendered. Hence, it is held that this authority does not have jurisdiction to pass any ruling on such matters.

Nicotine Polacrilex Lozenge falls under Chapter Heading 38.24: AAAR Karnataka

December 3, 2019 840 Views 0 comment Print

In re Strides Emerging Markets Ltd (GST AAAR Karnataka) The active ingredient in ‘Nicotine Polacrilex Lozenge’ is Nicotine which is a natural alkaloid. Nicotine is bound to an ion-exchange resin (polymethacrilic acid) and administered in the form of tablets, chewing gum, lozenge or patches The chemical formulation of the nicotine bound to the resin polacrilexis […]

HC explains provision of Exemption from provisions of Section 194A to Co-operative Societies

December 3, 2019 4638 Views 0 comment Print

High Court held that in the case of deposits made by the petitioner societies with the Co-operative Banks, they would be entitled to the benefit of exemption under Section 194A(3)(iii)(v) of the Income Tax Act and, in respect of the deposits made by the petitioner societies with the Treasury, they will not be entitled to the benefit of exemption under Section taxguru.in 194A(3)(iii)(a) of the Income Tax Act.

SCN Mandatory before levying interest on delayed payment of GST: HC

December 3, 2019 5007 Views 0 comment Print

Godavari Commodities Ltd. Vs Union of India (Jharkhand High Court) In the present case, though it is submitted by learned counsel for CGST that since the tax was paid, Section 73 (1) of the Act shall not be attracted in the case of the petitioner, but the fact remains that the tax was not paid […]

Presence of lawyers cannot be allowed during examination by GST officers

December 3, 2019 8064 Views 0 comment Print

Sudhir Kumar Aggarwal Vs Directorate General of GST Intelligence (Delhi High Court) Delhi High Court has held that presence of lawyer cannot be allowed at the time of questioning or examination of a person by the officers under the GST provisions. The Court observed that officers under GST law are not police officers and have […]

Cenvat credit on outdoor catering activity and rent-a-cab services

December 3, 2019 1338 Views 0 comment Print

M/s. Mediacom Media India Pvt. Ltd. Vs C.C.G.S.T. (CESTAT Mumbai) Observing that definition of input service was very wide and that the only condition precedent was that it should be the activity relating to business, CESTAT Mumbai has allowed Cenvat credit on outdoor catering services and rent-a-cab services for the period 2007-2010. Rule 2(l) of […]

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031