In the present case, Assessee is engaged in the business of providing accommodation entries to entry seekers. During the assessement proceedings AO held that the identity of the parties involved in the transactions were not furnished as well as genuineness of the transactions relating to total cash deposits were not satisfactorily explained by the assessee.
Service charges received by assessees from the foreign enterprises did not qualify for deduction in view of clause (iii) of the Explanation to Section 80O as the services rendered by respective assessees were the ‘services rendered in India’ and not the ‘services rendered from India’ and merely having a contract with a foreign enterprise and mere earning foreign exchange did not ipso facto lead to the application of s. 80O of the Act.
Mitha Ram Vs State of Punjab (Punjab and Haryana High Court) Learned counsel however submits that out of 29 witnesses, only 01 witness has been examined till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner then submits that because of the present COVID-19 situation and also the fact that trial is likely to take some time, detention […]
Shri Radha Raman Tripathy Vs CPIO (Central Information Commission) Central Information Commission has levied a penalty of Rs. 500/- to The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-3, Bokaro for not providing information to Mr. Radha Raman Tripathy. Please see the order dated 15.06.2020. FULL TEXT OF THE CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 1. The complainant filed an application under […]
Detained Tobaco Product Released on Payment of Tax along with Penalty and after providing Bank Guarantee of Equal to the value of goods detained.
Lease Plan India Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) These appeals are against disallowance made by the learned assessing officer under section 40 (a)(i) on account of non-deduction of tax at source on guarantee commission paid to lease plan Corporation NV Netherland is confirmed holding it to be payment in nature of Fees For Technical […]
Joydeep Sarkar Vs Himalaya Drug Company (NAA) Fact of the Case: The brief facts of the case are that under Rule 128 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 an application dated 27.11.2017 was filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering by the Applicant No. 1 alleging that the Respondent had […]
In re Aluri Krishna Prasad (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) Whether amount received for leasing residential hostel rooms is exempt under Sl.No.14 (Heading 9963) of Notification No.12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 as amended upto 25.01.2018 and Whether amount received for leasing residential hostel rooms is exempt under Sl.No.12 (Heading 9963) of Notification No.12/2017- Central Tax […]
Bhuwan Chandra Pandey vs Union Of India And Others (Uttarakhand High Court) More than two decades have elapsed since the Supreme Court passed a landmark judgment in case of Vishakha vs. State of Rajasthan AIR 1997 SC 301, and formulate the famous ‘Vishakha guidelines‘, which inter alia providing guidance for the resolution of complaints through internal […]
The issue under consideration is whether CSR is also eligible for deduction u/s 80G of the Act subject to assessee satisfying the requisite conditions prescribed for deduction u/s 80G?
