The CCI investigated Baxium Health Science for failing to pass on GST reductions. Detailed findings highlight discrepancies in product pricing post-GST cut.
AAAR held that ‘rotary parking system’, installed and commissioned at premises of appellant amounts to construction of an immovable property, whereby input tax credit on the purchase of ‘rotary parking system’, by appellant becomes ineligible under Section 17(5)(d) of CGST/TNGST Acts, 2017.
Supreme Court held that amendment to Section 80DD of the Income Tax Act by virtue of the Finance Act, 2022 is effective only from 1st April 2023 and the same cannot be given retrospective effect.
Madhya Pradesh High Court held that an appeal to the High Court from a decision of the Tribunal lies only when a substantial question of law is involved. Appeal dismissed in absence of substantial question of law.
Delhi High Court held that determination as carried out by the Designated Authority under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 [DTVSV Act] is clearly rendered finality and cannot possibly be reopened or revised by any authority under the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, rectification notice issued u/s. 154 quashed.
ITAT Bangalore held that interest/ dividend from co-operative society is eligible for deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act. However, if payer bank is co-operative bank then deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) is not available.
ITAT Jaipur upheld the deletion of Rs. 72 lakh addition, ruling that the assessee sufficiently explained the source of cash deposits made during demonetization.
ITAT Chennai quashes penalty under sections 271(1)(c) and 271A for AY 2012-13 to 2016-17 in the Srinivasan Chandrasekara case, citing legal deficiencies.
Guwahati High Court held that invocation of extended period of limitation unjustified as entire details of availment of CENVAT Credit disclosed in STR-3 return and there is no allegation of wilful suppression and misstatement with intent to evade service tax in notice.
ITAT Delhi held that addition towards undisclosed investment in shares and unsecured loans merely based on observation made by DCIT without independent inquiry by AO is unjustified and hence the addition is liable to be deleted.
