Allahabad High Court directed departmental officer to furnish all documents referred in show cause notice with regard to cancellation of GST registration and also directed to pass speaking order post filing of reply by the petitioner.
Delhi High Court held that as per Article 12 of India-Ireland DTAA revenue receipt from aircraft leasing is outside the purview of taxation. Thus, it is impermissible to invoke section 9(1)(vi) in light of express exemption under DTAA.
Orissa High Court held that tractor trolly is not a ‘motor vehicle’ for the purpose of section 2(h) of the Orissa Entry Tax Act, 1999 and hence not amenable to entry tax. Accordingly, petition allowed.
Rajasthan High Court held that in absence of migration, petitioner unable to login GST common portal due to which returns not uploaded and tax not deposited. Accordingly, authorities directed to immediately allow petitioner to login on GST portal.
Delhi HC directs GST department to provide requested documents to petitioner for appeal purposes in case Nishant Tandon Vs Commissioner. Legal matter involves GST registration.
Tribunal upheld 20% addition instead of 25% on alleged bogus purchases due to unverified sellers agreeing that assessee failed to prove the genuineness of the transactions, and confirmed penalty proceedings.
Himachal Pradesh HC held that the State and Central Governments have been extended the same powers under the CGST and SGST Act and if one of the officers has already initiated proceedings, the same cannot be transferred to another.
Liability to capital gains had not arisen in the assessment year 2017-18 as occupancy certificate was received on 01/02/2017 for commercial portion and 17/03/2017 for residential portion but in the assessment year 2018-19 on receipt of possession.
Assessee claimed that in section 14A, the disallowance of expenditure even if computed in accordance with Rule 8D could not exceed the exempt income earned in that year.
Distribution revenue received by Turner Broadcasting System Asia Pacific, Inc. ( TBSAP ), a U.S.-based company, from its Indian affiliate was not taxable as “royalty” under the Income Tax Act, 1961, or the India-U.S.
