Present application has been filed on behalf of Taxation Bar Association seeking modification of Para 35(11.17)(iv) of the judgment dated 19th March, 2024 insofar as it requires twelve appearances in a year to be eligible to vote in elections.
Gauhati High Court held that the Summary of the Show Cause Notice along with the attachment containing the determination of tax cannot be said to be a valid initiation of proceedings under Section 73 without issuance of a proper Show Cause Notice.
Bombay High Court remanded the matter of correct treatment of losses arising due to exchange rate fluctuation since order doesn’t deal with import of Section 43A of the Income Tax Act and its interplay with section 37(1).
Assessee challenged CIT(A) order before the Bangalore Bench of ITAT arguing that 1450 grams of gold should not be considered unexplained as it fell within the permissible limits of CBDT Instruction No. 1916.
Assessee, to avoid delay and demurrage charges, cleared the goods on payment of the enhanced customs duty, under protest, and requested the lower authority to issue the order(s) of assessment under Section 17(5) of the Customs Act, 1962.
Until all the components of the complete article were presented together for assessment at the same point of time, Rule 2(a) of General Interpretative Rules could not be invoked to classify the parts as complete article.
ITAT Chandigarh held that since notices were issued through ITBA portal only it cannot be treated as a valid service of notice. Accordingly, proceedings initiated under section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act is liable to be quashed.
ITAT Bangalore held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained money send back for de novo reassessment due to difference in amounts and unclear information.
Orissa High Court dismissed the petition relating to levy of fine due to late filing of bill of entry due to availability of statutory remedy. Directed petitioner to find statutory remedy who can deal with its grievance.
The assessee is an individual, whose case for AY 2011-12 was reopened on the basis of AIR information available in the system of department, accordingly, a notice u/s 148 was issued on 30.03.2018 and served upon the assessee through RPAD.
