CESTAT Delhi held that communication modules being parts of communication hubs is classifiable under CTI 8517 70 90. Accordingly, differential duty and also interest and imposition of penalty u/s. 114A set aside.
ITAT Delhi held that provisions of section 68 or 69A of the Income Tax Act for cash deposit during demonetization period unjustified since source of cash deposits duly explained. Hence, addition liable to be deleted.
Delhi High Court held that suo moto disallowance with bona fide yet mistaken belief that amount is liable to be offered for taxation, such mistake can be rectified via revision application under section 264 of the Income Tax Act.
Supreme Court examines “first offence” definition under Section 276CC of the Income Tax Act in the Vinubhai Mohanlal Dobaria case. Detailed analysis of the ruling.
ITAT Chennai ruled that brokers facilitating land deals are not liable under Section 269SS as they act on behalf of clients and do not receive payments in their own right.
Bombay High Court rules that service tax cannot be imposed solely on income tax return data. The department may issue a fresh notice for income from other sources.
Andhra Pradesh HC quashes GST assessment order due to missing DIN, citing Supreme Court and CBIC guidelines. Fresh assessment directed with proper notice and DIN.
Telangana HC upholds tax addition under Section 69A, ruling that the assessee’s land was not under cultivation, rejecting agricultural income exemption claim.
Supreme Court confirms that Section 153C notices issued without a valid satisfaction note are invalid, aligning with the Delhi High Court’s decision in PCIT vs. Dev Technofab Ltd.
Delhi High Court rules on Section 153C notices for AYs 2014-15 to 2020-21 in Dev Technofab Limited Vs DCIT, citing lack of incriminating material for reopening assessments.
