AO in the final order passed on 19.01.2017 however, made disallowance of weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB) to the extent of 3,38,82,341/-. Aggrieved with such order of the Assessing Officer / TPO / DRP, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.
Bombay High Court rules that profit estimation in bogus purchases does not raise a substantial question of law, dismissing the Income Tax Department’s appeal.
ITAT Hyderabad held that resorting to estimation of profit in case of best judgement assessment without rejection of books of accounts is unjustifiable. Accordingly, matter set aside to the file of the lower authorities for reconsideration of the issue.
ITAT Chennai held that provisions of section 69A of the Income Tax Act could not be invoked when cash is sourced out of recorded sales. Accordingly, appeal allowed and addition u/s. 69A is liable to be deleted.
Rajasthan High Court quashes IT notice against Prateek Bulls and Bears Pvt Ltd due to lack of evidence linking bank account to the assessee.
ITAT Hyderabad rejects Papaiah Pulipati’s appeal due to an inordinate 10+ year delay, citing lack of justification and Supreme Court precedent on condonation of delay.
ITAT Mumbai upheld the disallowance of deductions claimed by Navbharat Urban Co-operative Credit Society under Section 80P(2)(d), treating income as taxable.
ITAT Pune held that when no addition has been made on account of which the case was reopened, the Assessing Officer cannot make any other addition without issuing a fresh notice u/s 148 of the Act.
Assessee challenged the order of cancellation of registration on the ground of not providing an opportunity of hearing as well as such order was passed without assigning any reason for cancellation of the registration of assessee.
The Court emphasized that any denial of ITC should clearly reference the applicable clause under Section 17(5) to allow the taxpayer a reasonable opportunity to contest the claim.
