Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bosch Automotive Electronics India Private Limited Vs Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bosch Automotive Electronics India Private Limited Vs Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) CESTAT Chennai held that denial of refund claim related to cenvat credit of service tax under RCM by invoking provisions of Section 142(8) of the CGST Act is cannot be justified. Accordingly, order rejected refund claim set aside. Facts- The Appellant pursuant to an audit conducted by the Department in November 2017, paid Service Tax along with applicable interest of Rs. 39,18,672/- on 08.12.2017, under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) on the import of services like Royalty, Technical/Pr...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930