Assessee was specifically asked to justify its claim as the agreement had to be with (a) Central Government (b) State Government (c) Local Authority or (d) Statutory Authority and LMRCL did not fit in any of the four categories.
Appellant had approached this Court by way of the present intra Court appeal. It was held that BoD had failed to accord any reason as to how the mere act of dishonor of cheques issued by assessee would amount to misconduct.
Delhi High Court held that reassessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act entirely based on course of survey not sustainable and liable to be quashed. Further, survey in particular year cannot be extrapolated to other years.
Jharkhand High Court held that rejection of refund of statutory pre-deposit merely because refund application was filed beyond section 54 of the Income Tax Act not justified as refund of pre-deposit is vested right of an assessee.
The petitioner is inter-alia, engaged in the manufacture and sale of edible oil. According to the petitioner, the rate of tax on output supplies made by the petitioner exceeds the rate of tax on input supplies.
ITAT Ahmedabad upholds deduction of GST interest & late fees, ruling they are compensatory, not penal. Read the key observations & legal precedents cited.
Madras High Court rules in A.R. Safiullah Vs ACIT, quashing a tax notice under Section 153A for AY 2009-10, citing statutory limits on search-based assessments.
ITAT Visakhapatnam sets aside penalty on Malla Appalaraju under Section 271(1)(c) due to a defective notice, ruling it void ab initio.
Andhra Pradesh High Court invalidates GST order due to missing officer signature and DIN, citing precedent. Fresh assessment permitted under proper procedure.
ITAT Mumbai rules on Radiant Life Care’s appeal against disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act. Key interpretation of Rule 8D(2)(ii) discussed.
