Detailed analysis of the Customs Authority for Advance Rulings’ decision on Teachmint’s Interactive Flat Panels under Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
Classification of Small Form Factor Pluggable Transceivers under Customs Tariff, along with duty eligibility under Notification No. 57/2017-Cus, is discussed.
Bundy India Ltd seeks advance ruling on the classification of fuel pump parts used in vehicles under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
CAAR Delhi ruled that Samsung’s Galaxy Ring and Sizing Kit are correctly classified under HSN 90318000 for measuring or checking instruments under Customs Tariff Act
CAAR Delhi ruled that Danisco’s palm oil-based products are correctly classified under CTH 3404 90 39, not under CTH 3824, based on HSN guidelines.
Allahabad High Court quashed a GST cancellation order citing a violation of natural justice due to the absence of a hearing. Legal principles reinforced in the case.
Assessee is an individual filed his Return of Income for AY 2013-14 at Rs.10,98,540/-. During the year consideration, assessee along with other co-owners sold two immovable properties for a consideration of Rs.1,20,60,000/- and Rs.1,85,40,000/-.
SC holds pure coconut oil as edible oilunder Heading 1513 unless marketed as hair oil. Judgment resolves a 15-year excise duty dispute.
During the scrutiny of GST monthly returns for AY 2018-19, it was found that there existed a difference between the ITC available as per GSTR-2A and ITC availed as per GSTR-3B to the tune of Rs.10,22,809/- of IGST.
NCLAT Delhi held that post approval of resolution plan Non-Fund Based [NFB] agreement has to be read in a manner to give effect to the resolution plan and not to make any clause of resolution plan otiose and unworkable.
