Madras High Court sets aside order denying GST exemption on lorry hire income to GTA, citing Notification 12/2017 and lack of reasoned response.
Karnataka HC rules single tax ‘satisfaction note’ invalid for multiple years. Separate notes required under Section 153C, impacting tax assessments.
Kerala HC dismisses co-op bank appeals, affirming Income Tax Officer (Intelligence)’s authority to seek information under Section 133(6) before 2014 CBDT notification.
Madhya Pradesh HC upholds CIT’s Section 263 revision citing lack of enquiry by AO. Tribunal ruling supported by Supreme Court precedents.
ITAT Ahmedabad cancels penalty on I-Serve Systems as disallowance was based on estimation without proof of concealment or inaccurate income details.
Delhi High Court held that application of funds by Indian Broadcasting Foundation in BARC doesn’t qualify as deployment was not intended to yield income/profit hence denial of exemption u/s. 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act not justified.
ITAT Delhi held that once the books of accounts are rejected, it doesn’t warrant any adhoc addition. Thus, CIT(A) rightly restricted GP @ 1% instead of 1.5% as estimated by AO. Appeal dismissed, accordingly.
CESTAT Delhi held that duty demand on Student Almanac and teacher planner is uphold, however, extended period of limitation is not invocable since there was no evidence of intention to evade payment of duty and suppression of facts.
Karnataka High Court held that blocking of Electronic Credit Ledger by invoking Rule 86A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 [CGST Rules] without granting pre-decisional hearing and without stating cogent reason in order is impermissible in law.
Karnataka High Court held that during re-assessment proceedings, claim for Input Tax Credit can be rectified under section 39 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, even when the same is disadvantageous to the State Exchequer.
