Bombay High Court sets aside VAT review order in Starlight System Pvt Ltd case, granting a hearing and remanding the matter to the appropriate officer.
Visakhapatnam ITAT ruled against depreciation claims for uninstalled machinery by ACIT vs Mithra Kyokuto, citing lack of operational evidence for A.Y. 2012-13.
Punjab and Haryana High Court held that action of the department already taken under section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 doesn’t restrain GST authorities from conducting audit. Accordingly, writ dismissed.
Delhi High Court held that initiation of reassessment proceedings under section 148 of the Income Tax Act liable to be quashed in as much as conditions set out in section 150 of the Income Tax Act not fulfilled.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that tax rate u/s. 115BBE of the Income Tax Act increased from 30% to 60% and the same is applicable only with effect from 1st April 2017 and not prior to the same. Hence, appeal allowed to that extent.
NCLAT Delhi held that belated filing of contingent claims (i.e. claims arising from damages and breach of contract) is rightly rejected by the resolution professional. Accordingly, appeal dismissed.
ITAT Delhi remanded the matter back to the file of AO (TDS) for proper verification of quantum of External Development Charges (EDC) for demand of tax under section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act.
Kerala High Court held that there is no provision in Section 130 of the Goods and Services Tax Act which prohibits the interim release of goods which are detained pending finalization of proceedings under Section 130.
NCLAT Delhi held that after initiation of moratorium under section 14(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 [IBC], no assessment proceedings can be continued by EPFO. Accordingly, appeal dismissed.
There was no rationale in Notification No. 53 of 2023, Central Tax which was brought out on 02.11.2023 only permitted appeals to be filed from orders passed by the proper officer on or before 31.03.2023, s a cut off date as the notification itself was brought out on 02.11.2023 and in such circumstances any order passed in at least three months before that date; the time provided for filing an appeal, ought to have been considered for such beneficial treatment.
