Goods (tyres) imported by assessee was without any BIS markings being in violation of the statutory provisions were not permissible to be imported, and hence they were liable for confiscation under Section 111 of the Customs Act.
In the matter above-mentioned ITAT resored the matter to CIT (A) who did not provide opportunity of being heard by way of video conferencing despite request.
It was argued on behalf of the assessee that the action of AO amounts to a double addition as the claiming of Capital Gains was accurately tendered in the Return of Income.
Petitioner has challenged order passed by first appellate authority. Petitioner engaged in the business of manufacturing and sale of goods claimed to be exempted from liability of tax/duty under the GST Act.
As goods were cleared on the bill of entry of the appellant, hence it was made a party by the department. Differential custom duty was demanded jointly and severally from BGH and appellant.
CCI dismisses allegations by Rajesh George against Honda India for abuse of dominance, citing lack of evidence and contractual disputes.
Gujarat High Court rules on GST refunds under Inverted Duty Structure, affirming claims based on amended formula for applications within the prescribed period.
ITAT Delhi clarifies tax treatment for Motricity India: No levy on notional income or closure costs. Insights on Transfer Pricing adjustments and ALP determination.
Supreme Court rules in favor of a bona fide auction-purchaser under the SARFAESI Act, emphasizing due diligence and addressing ownership disputes in loan recovery cases.
CESTAT Kolkata rules Vedanta Ltd. entitled to 12% interest for 15-year delay in export duty refund due to delayed finalization of shipping bills by Paradeep Customs.
