Income Tax Tribunal rules on Rs. 23.33 lakh addition, clarifying Section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) for land held as stock-in-trade versus personal asset.
An assessee’s appeal against a ₹36.34 lakh cash deposit addition was dismissed by NFAC, New Delhi, due to a procedural error. The challenge targeted a rectification order, not the original assessment.
Mumbai ITAT dismisses Revenue appeal, affirming CIT(A)’s decision to delete ₹37.84 Cr bogus purchase addition for a bulk drug manufacturer, citing sufficient evidence.
Supreme Court examines Sulthan Said Ibrahim’s appeal against impleadment and tenancy claims, as specific performance decree faces persistent delays in execution.
Karnataka High Court ruled that blocking an Electronic Credit Ledger (ECrL) requires a pre-decisional hearing, emphasizing natural justice principles and objective reasons.
Karnataka High Court held that assumption of jurisdiction under section 147 of the Income Tax Act untenable since mandatory requirement of section 149(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act not complied. Accordingly, writ petition allowed and notice u/s. 148 quashed.
ITAT Jaipur held that disallowance u/s. 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act untenable since amount of commission paid to a non resident outside India for the services rendered outside India will not fall in the category of income, and as such would not be chargeable to tax.
Bombay High Court held that reopening of the assessment would be permissible without there being any new or additional material available to the Assessing Office. Accordingly, reassessment notice is set aside and writ petition is allowed.
Supreme Court examines Bombay High Court’s decision on deemed conveyance under MOFA. Case involves property partition, developer obligations, and competent authority’s jurisdiction.
ITAT Raipur held that reopening of proceedings under section 148 of the Income Tax Act beyond a period of 4 years without failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully & truly all the material facts is liable to be annulled.
