Delhi High Court rules on DMRC’s GST refund, clarifying the “relevant date” for limitation based on a conciliation agreement, setting aside rejection orders.
Bengaluru tax authorities challenge NFAC order on unsecured loan deletion, citing Rule 46A violation. Case remitted for fresh adjudication.
High Court rules GST Section 130 invalid for excess stock, affirming Section 73/74 for tax determination. Rs. 14.58 lakh demand set aside.
Delhi High Court rules manufacturer discounts to retailers are not prima facie consideration for services, staying a ₹9.85 Cr GST demand on Vardhman Electronics.
Allahabad High Court upholds penalty, affirming that a valid e-way bill is mandatory for goods movement post-April 2018 amendment to UPGST Rules.
The CESTAT Delhi has ruled in favor of Rambagh Palace Hotel Pvt. Ltd., allowing full Cenvat credit on management consultancy services, citing judicial precedents.
Allahabad High Court has stayed a ₹16.85 crore GST demand against Shree Girraj Food Products, questioning the classification of savoury snacks and the invocation of the extended limitation period.
Delhi High Court directs release of GST refund with interest, affirming Appellate Authority’s order, cautioning taxpayers about potential interest if order is reversed later.
ITAT Pune sets aside CIT(A) order, condoning 374-day delay due to assessee’s illness and tax practitioner’s death, remanding the case for a new hearing.
ITAT Ahmedabad rules a private discretionary trust created by will and being the sole trust is not liable to the maximum marginal rate, applying association of persons rates.
