Explore the Mandava Foundation vs. ITO case, where the Hyderabad ITAT condones an assessee’s mistake in registration, allowing them to rectify the error and granting regular registration.
Tribunal ruled that mere disallowance of expenses or enhancement of returned income does not automatically warrant the imposition of penalties under Section 271(1)(c)
ITAT considered the justification provided by the assessee, which referenced KITCO and Reuters databases for determining transaction prices. However, the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) argued that the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) should be the primary source for estimating bullion trading prices.
Explore the Delhi High Court’s judgment on royalty payments by Dabur India Ltd, implications for tax deductions under Sections 80IC & 80IB, and its impact on industrial undertakings.
Impugned order and notice indicated that sanctioning authority was PCIT. However, since issuance date of both documents was beyond three years from relevant assessment year, Section 151(ii) of Act mandated that sanctioning authority should have been PCCIT.
ITAT held that if sales are not disputed and there is no discrepancy between purchases and declared sales, addition should be restricted to bring gross profit on alleged bogus purchases in line with other genuine purchases.
The tribunal emphasized that the CIT(E) should have evaluated the entire trust deed in conjunction with the actual charitable activities conducted by the trust to determine whether it solely served the Christian community or provided benefits to the broader community.
ACIT Vs Merchant Agri Global Private Limited – Detailed analysis of Mumbai ITAT’s decision regarding adhoc disallowance of expenses without rejecting books of account. Full text of the order provided.
Discover the ruling of the Calcutta High Court in the case of Lokenath Construction Private Limited vs Joint Commissioner of State Tax/Revenue and Others, highlighting the importance of proper verification before denying Input Tax Credit.
HC held that goods mentioned in invoice and e-way bill matched; in terms of quantity and value; non-mention of dispatch address is a minor breach not inviting provisions of section 129
