ITAT Mumbai held that notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act issued after a period of six years is barred by limitation. Accordingly, assessment proceedings under section 147 is liable to be quashed.
Delhi High Court held that Section 153C as application at relevant time didn’t contemplate two tier recordal of satisfaction. Thus, proceedings u/s. 153C couldn’t have been triggered mechanically without formation of opinion by AO of non-searched person.
CESTAT Kolkata held that Indian Refractory Mortar is classifiable under CTH 38160000 and not under CTH 2610. Thus, no export duty payable on the same. Accordingly, appeal of the revenue dismissed.
High Court failed to examine whether the complaint, even if taken at face value, established the personal liability of the directors under the Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900.
It was held that considering the provisions of CBDT Circular No. 1916 and the explanation provided by the assessee, the seized gold jewellery up to the specified thresholds for each family member should be treated as explained.
Bombay High Court held that reassessment proceeding u/s. 148 initiated against non-existing company is not sustainable in law in as much as the department was already informed about the merger. Accordingly, notice quashed.
ITAT Kolkata addressed TDS disallowance and procedural compliance in PBN Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT. Analysis includes judicial precedents and key findings.
ITAT Amritsar held that there is no violation of provisions of section 269SS of the Income Tax Act when cash payment was made at one go before sub-registrar at the time of registration of sale deed. Accordingly, penalty under section 271D deleted.
ITAT Pune remands the appeal of Mula Parisar Serva Seva Sangh regarding TDS refund claim for 2018-19, citing past precedents.
ITAT Chennai sets aside CIT(E)’s rejection of 80G registration for SKNNSM Society, citing inadequate time for response. Case sent for fresh adjudication.
