Case Law Details
Case Name : DCIT Vs Suresh Kanaji (ITAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 483 & 484/Bang/2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/12/2024
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Bangalore
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
DCIT Vs Suresh Kanaji (ITAT Bangalore)
Conclusion: Addition made under Section 69B concerning seized jewellery was deleted as gold jewellery found during a search at the residence of the taxpayer was within the permissible limits prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 1916, and therefore, could not be treated as an unexplained investment.
Held: Assessee was a Bangalore-based contractor, whose residence was searched by Income Tax authorities. During the search, officials discovered 1,724.82 grams of gold jewellery, out of which 612.86 grams were s
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.