High Court directs the Income Tax Department to refund Rs 63.9 lakh recovered from a Co-operative Society after its appeal against a tax demand succeeded. Order includes interest.
Madras High Court held that rejection of e-Form NDH-4 application beyond time limit of 45 days is not allowable hence petitioner directed to submit a fresh reply regarding compliance of defects stated in orders.
Supreme Court held that Schott (principal domestic manufacturer) offering volume-based discounts doesn’t constitute abuse of dominance under section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002.
West Bengal GST AAAR remands TCG Urban case on fitted asset classification to AAR. Parties cited Bharati Airtel & BSNL tests; issue hinges on asset nature & agreements.
CESTAT Delhi held that imposition of penalty under section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 not justified since revenue failed to establish direct involved of Customs Broker in mis-declaration of imported goods. Accordingly, appeal allowed and penalty deleted.
ITAT Pune held that in respect of unabated assessment, no addition can be made by AO in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search under section 132 of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, order set aside and appeal allowed.
ITAT Kolkata held that the reopening of assessment cannot be allowed on the basis of vague reasons, where AO has not done anything as there was gross non-application of mind by the Assessing Officer. Accordingly, reopening of assessment u/s. 147 is quashed.
Bombay High Court held that notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act beyond the time period specified under section 149(1) of the Income Tax Act is non-complaint and invalid. Accordingly, order passed thereon is liable to be quashed.
Mumbai ITAT reviews dispute over tax deductibility of claim payout provision for a credit guarantee trust under the Mudra Yojana scheme.
Mumbai ITAT dismisses revenue appeals, ruling tax additions in completed assessments require incriminating material found during the assessee’s search.
