NCLAT Dehi held that if the CoC arbitrarily rejects a just settlement offer, the Adjudicating Authority as well as the Appellate Authority can always set aside such a decision. Thus, order admitting section 7 application upheld.
Karnataka High Court held that co-operative society registered under Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997 is not required to deduct TDS on interest payments made to its members as per provisions of section 194A(3)(v) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Kolkata held that dividend distribution tax u/s 115-O of the Act and interest u/s 115P of the Income Tax Act is applicable only to a domestic company and since appellant is a co-operative society and provisions of section 115-O and 115-P will not be applicable.
Gujarat High Court held that transfer order passed under section 127 of the Income Tax Act tenable in law since the same is passed after giving proper opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. Accordingly, transfer order upheld and petition dismissed.
Calcutta High Court rules DGGI cannot initiate a parallel GST investigation for periods already audited by State GST authorities. This prevents multiple inquiries by different agencies for the same tax period.
The issue involved in the present petition is that the Electronic credit ledger of the petitioner was blocked by the impugned order dated 26.03.2025, by invoking Rule 86A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017.
ITAT Bangalore held that the interest income received by way of mandatory / statutory deposits would also eligible for deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act by treating the said income as business income. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee allowed.
ITAT Mumbai held that invocation of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act on account of difference of opinion is not sustainable in law. Accordingly, revision order passed by PCIT is liable to be quashed.
CESTAT Delhi rules royalty for permanent trademark use is a ‘deemed sale,’ not subject to service tax. Explains the nuances of exclusive, long-term licenses.
Madras High Court condones 72-day appeal delay for Red Rose Garments, citing an ex-parte GST order remaining unnoticed on the portal as a genuine reason.
