Uttarakhand High Court rules GST confiscation invalid if solely based on driver’s reply without owner’s hearing, citing Section 130(4) CGST Act violation.
The ITAT Delhi set aside a reassessment order against Aashiyana Infrastructure Development Pvt. Ltd., citing a violation of CBDT instructions on jurisdictional limits, as the DCIT passed the order instead of the ITO.
Allahabad High Court stays an order against Sri Sai Vishwas Polymers, ruling it invalid as it was passed after the omission of GST Rule 96(10) without a saving provision.
Bombay High Court stays GST demand on assignment of long-term leasehold rights, citing Gujarat High Court’s view on immovable property transfers.
Jharkhand High Court enhanced the amount of permanent alimony by directing to pay a sum of Rs. 50,000 per month to wife who has no other source of income and Rs. 40,000 per month to son who is suffering from Autism.
ITAT Pune reduced ad-hoc disallowances on salary, advertisement, vehicle, and travel expenses to 10% for Prafulla Shantilal Kothari, citing audited books and no specific defects.
ITAT Delhi held that intimation under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act being passed without waiting for the response of the assessee and without providing thirty day time for filing response is not sustainable in law. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
Calcutta High Court overturns Section 148A(d) income tax order for AY 2018-19, citing natural justice violation due to lack of personal hearing. Case remanded for re-evaluation.
NCLAT Chennai held that delay in filing Restoration Application in the Contempt Proceedings deserves to be condoned since the reasons given for delay appears to be reasonable. Accordingly, delay of 374 days condoned.
ITAT Delhi held that deduction under section 54F of the Income Tax Act duly available since funds are utilized within the extended period of time as per CBDT Circular No. 1/2023 dated 06.01.2023. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
