Explore the ITAT Kolkata ruling on Sunil Khaitan Vs DCIT, delving into the adequacy of fund sources under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Hyderabad rules Section 115BBDA of the Income Tax Act does not apply to domestic companies, deleting the addition made by the Income Tax Officer.
Discover the ITAT Delhi ruling in Anurag Singh vs. ITO, where it was decided that AO cannot rectify issues already settled by CIT(A). Full case analysis and implications.
Analysis of Allahabad High Court judgment on limitation period prescribed in special statutes versus the Limitation Act.
Read the detailed order by ITAT Bangalore regarding Samaja Seva Mandali vs. ITO. Assessing real intentions of trust in land purchase for school building construction.
CESTAT Delhi upheld penalties on Jayant Vikram for misdeclaration of goods to claim ineligible drawback. Detailed analysis of the case and legal implications.
The court observed that the cancellation of registration with retrospective effect cannot be mechanical and must be based on objective criteria. Mere non-filing of returns does not warrant retrospective cancellation covering the period when the returns were filed and the taxpayer was compliant. A
Dive into the detailed analysis of Syama Prasad Mookerjee Port’s case against DCIT at ITAT Kolkata regarding Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act. Understand why cessation of trading liability cannot be invoked without liability in books.
ITAT Delhi rules no penalty for All Fresh Supply Management Pvt. Ltd. under Section 271DA, acknowledging no intent to evade tax. Read the full judgment here.
CESTAT Bangalore ruling on AEG Power Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise case underscores that misdeclaration invites extended limitation.
