Supreme Court held that High Court observation regarding appellant’s advised to importer to mis-declare imported goods is incorrect since it was not a case of mis-declaration but a case of mis-classification. Accordingly, appeal disposed of.
The Karnataka High Court set aside an order against NL Tile Art Pvt. Ltd., citing that tax authorities failed to consider the company’s annual returns and ITC reversal forms.
ITAT Hyderabad held that levy of late filing fee u/s. 234E of the Income Tax Act for 1st, 2nd, and 3rd quarter TDS return in Form 26Q not justified since all the 3 quarter returns filed on or before due date of filing 4th quarter return and reasonable cause shown. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
ITAT Mumbai rules in favor of Ramesh Dhuri, deleting Rs.4.84L addition under Section 56(2)(x)(b)(B) due to retrospective 10% tolerance limit.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai has invalidated the reassessment against Sunidhi Securities & Finance Limited, citing an incorrect sanctioning authority for the Section 148 notice. The case centered on a reassessment initiated for alleged bogus trading losses, which the Tribunal deemed null and void based on the judicial precedent set by the Supreme Court.
NCLAT Delhi held that rejection of application under section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code justifiable since application filed after expiry of period of three years is barred by limitation. Accordingly, appeal dismissed.
NCLT Kolkata taking recourse to section 65 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code directs closure of CIRP since initiation of CIRP was done fraudulently with malicious intent to escape from government dues and for wrongful gain.
NCLAT Delhi held that additional time granted to vacate the property due to the fact of monsoon season and directed to vacate the premises in question till 15.09.2025. Appeal disposed of accordingly.
CESTAT Chennai held that Adjudicating authority has taken lenient view by levying penalty on Customs Broker for allowing use of license to unauthorised person and not revoking Customs Broker License. Accordingly, order of adjudicating authority upheld.
CESTAT Chennai held that Clear Float Glass is classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading [CTH] 7005 1090. Accordingly, impugned order is set aside and appeal of the assessee is allowed.
