Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Moqeetur Rahman Khan Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Moqeetur Rahman Khan Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow) Blaming Auditor Won’t Save You – ITAT Upholds Penalty for Delay in Furnishing Tax Audit Report; No Escape from Section 271B Penalty if Audit Report Not Signed in Time, Rules ITAT Lucknow Lucknow ITAT confirmed the levy of penalty u/s 271B  holding that failure to get the accounts audited &  to furnish the audit report within the prescribed time cannot be excused merely by blaming the Chartered Accountant for delay in e-filing. Assessee, engaged in derivative trading, had a turnover declared at ₹43.60 crore in Form 10DB &  ₹11.28 cr...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930