The Supreme Court of India rules that financial hardship is not a valid ground to waive or reduce the mandatory pre-deposit for filing an appeal.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition under section 69A towards unexplained cash deposit cannot be sustained since it is reasonably explained that deposit is out of its business proceeds. Accordingly, order of CIT(A) set aside and appeal of assessee allowed.
Orissa High Court held that writ petition against assessment order u/s. 147 read with section 144 of the Income Tax Act is not entertained due to availability of alternative remedy. Accordingly, writ dismissed.
Madras High Court quashes orders disallowing Input Tax Credit (ITC) for FY 2017-2021, citing the new Section 16(5) of the CGST Act.
CAAR Delhi holds flavoured supari classifiable under 21069030 and eligible for customs duty exemption under Notification 68/2012-Cus. Judicial precedents examined.
CAAR Delhi held flavoured supari is classifiable under 2106 9030, not raw areca nuts, and eligible for concessional duty under Notification 68/2012.
The Supreme Court of India dismisses a company’s appeal for failing to deposit the mandatory 20% of the disputed tax under the Odisha Entry Tax Act.
Bombay High Court held that combine reading of section 56 and 54(1) of the CGST Act states that interest @9% is payable when amount is not refunded within 60 days from the date of the order passed by the First Authority.
ITAT Chennai held that assessments under section 153C of the Income Tax Act stands vitiated in law since there is complete absence of proper and independent satisfaction as required u/s. 153C. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
The ITAT Pune has sent back a Rs. 28.71 lakh unexplained cash deposit case to the CIT(A), granting the assessee a fresh opportunity due to alleged unawareness of proceedings.
